On Fasting – Fasting Something Other Than Meals

Posted under Christian Year,Discipleship,Fasting,Lent,Lent 2007,Spiritual Disciplines by Matt on Saturday 24 February 2007 at 7:59 pm (+0000)

Many times, people react to the idea of fasting a meal: “I can’t do that!”  Their reactions are often even stronger when it is suggested that they fast for an extended period of time.  While fasting in the most traditional sense, and the sense in which it is used in Scripture, always involves missing meals, there are other ways to fast. 

There are, however, a few good guidelines for what makes a good (non-food) fast. 

First of all, fasting is a discipline of abstinence, undertaken for a period of time.  It is often coupled with prayer, since abstaining from an activity or from a certain dietary item should give us more time to engage in other spiritual disciplines. 

Several categories of activities fall into good fasting techniques.  If we are seeking to share in Christ’s self-emptying, we should consider fasting from some luxury item or activity.  While all our advertisements invite us to indulge, we will refrain.  Luxury items could be food-related, such as fine wine, sweets, snacks or meat.  Other luxuries could be certain forms of entertainment with which we are blessed.  Driving our car to work may be a luxury if we could just as well walk or ride the bus.  Luxury items might be the little “extras” upon which we spend money.

We might also consider fasting from things that distract us from our life with God – things that may be “indifferent” activities (those that neither harm nor help our relationship with God).  In our Western media-saturated culture, we could consider turning off the television, cell phone or radio, reducing Internet usage, or otherwise reducing our dependence on entertainment.  These are the things that consume much of our time, while being of only marginal benefit to us. 

Fasting also engages in abstinence from something we genuinely need, but can do without for a time, for the sake of drawing closer to God.  Clearly, food falls into this category, which is why it is so basic to fasting.  It is important, however, to make sure whatever we are fasting in this regard is not going to cause us long-term harm by being set aside for a time. 

Fasting can also be a process of controlling the boundaries of certain activities, such as work, sleep, or recreation, that often spill out into other areas of life.  Fasting in this regard leaves the laptop at work, the files at the office, the phone on silent mode.  For certain periods of the day, we leave those things behind to be focused on something else.  This, too, is a fast, which can help us see the appropriate boundaries we need to draw day in and day out. 

Finally, abstaining from activities we should not already be doing is not fasting.  That’s merely obedience.  Forty days of abstinence from hitting on that married woman at work isn’t fasting, that’s merely obeying God’s word.  Abstaining from speeding on the highway for 40 days would also fall into this category.  If we’re on a medically restrictive diet that we’ve been cheating on and we decide to stick with it for 40 days, that’s health and obedience, not fasting.  Calling this kind of behavior fasting is really self-deceptive and over-spiritualizes activities that God has already called us to.

As should be clear by now, fasting can incorporate a variety of approaches.  Fasting can teach us abstinence from sin and give us strength to believe that God provides for all our needs.  What ideas have you come up with?

3 Comments »

  1. Comment by Keith — Sunday, 25 February 2007 @ 10:18 am (+0000)

    So, since fasting involves backing off from some of our luxuries, can we spend an extended time of fasting from certain “favorite” foods and still find the same results as just plain out fasting from food?

  2. Comment by Matt — Sunday, 25 February 2007 @ 9:51 pm (+0000)

    Hmmm… “Results” are tricky things to measure, especially with unquantifiable things such as fasting.

    It’s different, somehow, in a way that I’m having trouble explaining. It’s not as intense to fast luxuries long-term, because it ends up becoming a discipline of simplicity – that is, living a simpler life, free of some luxuries, to provide resources for giving life elsewhere. Long-term abstension from luxury produces a “fasted lifestyle” that is simpler in its ability to connect with God; it is not as intense as food fasting, however. (At least in my experience.) Anything that we can abstain from for an extended period of time isn’t nearly as essential to life as daily food and drink. Therefore, while still fasting, and still a good practice (one which I practice in a number of ways myself), long-term luxury fasting (food or otherwise) has a different tone and a different intensity.

    Basically, your question is, in my experience, a bit of an apples-to-oranges comparison. No one would disdain an apple for not being an orange, but one should also not expect orange juice to come from it, either. :) Both kinds of fasting are valuable in their way, both can be intense in their way, but they behave differently. Ultimately, the fruit is similar, though: more dependence on God, more freedom from the things upon which we are dependent here and now.

    Does this help?

  3. Pingback by M Squared T Blog » On Simplicity - Living a Fasted Lifestyle — Monday, 26 February 2007 @ 8:28 am (+0000)

    [...] question on the last post on Fasting triggered some thoughts about the spiritual discipline of [...]

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment